Your country and preferred language.

Select your country Select language

Denna webbplats använder cookies för att säkerställa att du får den bästa upplevelsen.

Menu
Sökalternativ
Stäng

Välkommen till Sveriges största bokhandel

Här finns så gott som allt som givits ut på den svenska bokmarknaden under de senaste hundra åren.

  • Handla mot faktura och öppet köp i 21 dagar
  • Oavsett vikt och antal artiklar handlar du till enhetsfrakt från samma säljare i samma kundvagn
Artikel är såld. Gör en sökning då det ofta finns flera exemplar av samma titel bland våra annonser. Skapa ett användarkonto eller logga in om du vill skapa en bevakning. Klicka sedan på knappen nedan. Du aviseras via e-post så snart artikeln kommer in igen.
The Lawyer and Language

The Lawyer and Language

Inbunden bok. Iustus. 1996. 213 sidor.

Förlagsfakta

ISBN
917678309x
Titel
The Lawyer and Language
Författare
Bo Wennström
Förlag
Iustus
Utgivningsår
1996
Omfång
213 sidor
Bandtyp
Inbunden
Språk
English
Baksidestext
Bokpresentation
Lawyers have long been the object of criticism and satire for the incomprehensibility of their language. The Lawyer and Language provides a theoretical account of the legal language. In focus is the relationship of the lawyer to language.

The investigation starts with those pictures of language that can be found in jurisprudential work, legal textbooks, court findings etc. they are called 2common-sense” pictures of language”. Against those “pictures” of language the author puts forward the well-known idea taken from Wittgenstein that “meaning is use”. To illustrate this, he discusses how a statutory provision receives its meaning. He begins this discussion by looking at grammar.

Attention is then focused on an idea regarding language that received its classical formulation by Aristotle in his famous statement that language reflects thought, i.e. that words are “symbols or signs of affection or impressions of the soul”. The author gives an account of how this way of thinking lives today, albeit in a modern version, with linguists such as Chomsky and a number of people who work within jurisprudence. The insights gained from this are illustrated by means of a discussion concerning interpretation.

The conclusion deals with the danger of blindness to ordinary language, which, the author argues, the lawyer can be afflicted with because of a formal or mechanistic view of language. A solution for the solving of this problem is presented by drawing attention to the particular nature of the legal profession and the emphasis that has to be put on what is called tacit knowledge.